1 2026:CGHC:26092 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 669 of 2020 1 - Singhal Renewable Energy Private Limited A Company Incorporated Under The Companies Act, 1956, Having Its Registered Office At 11, Alankar, L.S. Road, Andheri (W), Mumbai-400058 Through Its Director Sheri Radheyshyam Agrawal ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Industries, Directorate Of Industries, Udyog Bhawan, Ring Road No.1, Telibandha- Raipur (C.G.), 2 - Vandana Vidyut Ltd A Company Under The Companies Act (Under Liquidation), Having Its Registered Office At, Vandana Bhawan, M.G. Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Through The Liquidator, Shri Sanjay Gupta 3 - Shri Sanjay Gupta Liquidator, Vandana Vidyut Limited, E-10A, Kailash Colony, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi- 110048 4 - Shri Sandeep Kumar Gupta Interim Resolution Professional, Vandana Vidyut Ltd, C-360, Basement, Defence Colony, New-Delhi-110024 ... Respondent(s) KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.06.29 18:11:07 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Shri Ashish Anand Bernard with Shri Ashish Mittal, Advocates. For Respondent/ State : Shri Sangharsh Pandey, GA. For Respondents No.2 & 3 : Shri Sumesh Bajaj with Shri Rishabh Bajaj, Advocates. For Respective Intervenors : Shri Akash Kundu and Shri Harsh Dave on behalf of Shri Pankaj Singh, Advocates. H on'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu , J Order On Board 25/06/2026 1. Today this Writ Petition is listed for consideration on IA No.8/2024, application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC seeking amendment in the writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by way of amendment the petitioner is making prayer to amend the writ petition to challenge the order dated 21.2.2020 passed by the NCLT, Cuttack Bench. 3. In the present Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- “(i) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ holding and/or declaring that the Sale Notice dated 8.2.2020 issued by the Respondent no.3 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Petitioner’s right decreed under the award dated 28.9.2017 and consequentially quash the impugned sale notices to the extent it seeks to auction the Biomass Power Plant (8 MW Capacity) (Annexure P- 9); and /or (ii) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing and commanding and or directing that the Respondent no.2 and 3 to comply with the terms and conditions of the arbitral award dated 28.9.2017 and consequentially quash the impugned sale notices to the extent it seeks to auction 3 the Biomass Power Plant (8 MW Capacity) (Annexure P-9); and/or (iii) Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case along with cost of the petition.” 4. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that as there was no interim order, now all the sale proceedings have been completed. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as subsequent to filing of the present writ petition, the NCLT, Cuttack Bench has passed an order on 21.2.2020, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition to challenge the order passed by the NCLT, Cuttack Bench, by way of separate proceeding, in accordance with law. 6. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Barve