2026:JHHC:24981 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6839 of 2026 1. Bonj Tumui, aged about 28 years, 2. Odiya Tumui, aged about 22 years Both Sons of Bir Singh Tumui, Resident of Village- Gangsa Tola- Karogutu, P.O. and P.S.-Gua, District- Singhbhum West. … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Advocate --- 04/19.08.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in custody since 18.03.2026 in connection with Gua P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, corresponding to S.T. Case No. 197 of 2026, for the alleged offence registered under Section 103(1), 238 read with Section 3(5) of BNS pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the first information report itself, the body of the deceased was found when one dog was trying to eat the dead body. He has submitted that apart from circumstantial evidence, there is nothing against the petitioners to connect the petitioners with the alleged offence. There is no recovery on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioners rather, the body had recovered earlier. The charge sheet has already been submitted. He submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail and has referred to paragraph 22 of the case diary and has submitted that one of the witnesses had seen the petitioners and the petitioners had confessed before him that they had 2026:JHHC:24981 2 killed the deceased and buried the dead body and on that basis the petitioners have been made accused. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and there is no eye witness to the occurrence and case against the petitioner is based on confession and the charge sheet having been submitted and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in connection with Gua P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026, corresponding to S.T. Case No. 197 of 2026 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioners. (ii) The other bailor should be their close relative. (iii) The petitioners will attend the court on each and every date and on account of their single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioners. (iv) The petitioners will deposit a self-attested copy of their Aadhar Card along with their mobile number before the learned court which they will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioners shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 19.08.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-20.08.2026