Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2355 (CAL)

SAJID MALLICK AND ANR. v. NIAZ MOHAMMED

CRR/5422/2024 · 2026-02-11

Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

11.02.2026 (SL-265) Susanta Court No.29 CRR 5422 of 2024 With IA No: CRAN 1 of 2025 In the matter of : Mr. Sajid Mallick & Anr. ….Petitioners Md. Adil Badar, Mr. Sobhan Gani, …for the Petitioners. Mr. Francis Samson Correa, Ms. Sneha Singh, Mr. Ankush Chowdhury …for the Opposite Party. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has preferred the instant application for quashing of the impugned proceeding being AC Case No. 3540 of 2024 presently pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate 5th Court, Alipore. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and, as such, if the proceeding is quashed, he does not have any objection. Having heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the opposite party and also considering the submissions made on behalf of the complainant, the instant proceeding being AC Case No. 3540 of 2024, presently pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate 5th Court, Alipore is hereby quashed. 2 The instant application being CRR 5422 of 2024 and the connected application being CRAN No. 1 of 2025 are thus disposed of. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)