Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23549 (AP)

Ravi kanth Choragudi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6602/2022 · 2026-02-08

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010433192022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6602/2022 Between: 1.RAVI KANTH CHORAGUDI, , S/O. YOHAN, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. EX. COUNCILOR, R/O. H. NO. 15/228/D2, KATTAPALLI VARI STREET, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P-521301 ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, NELAPADU, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2.CHODAVARAPU PRABATH, S/O VENKATESWARA RAO, WARD ADMIN SECRETARY, SECRTARIAT 31ST WARD SATYANARAYANAPURAM, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P- 521301. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.G ELISHA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioner. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.875 of 2022 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum- Judicial First Class Magistrate, Gudivada. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioner has not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioner is either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026 VTS