Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23547 (AP)

THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/22560/2023 · 2026-03-23

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010434392023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 22560/2023 Between: 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, ANANTHAPURAM BRANCH, MR. M. PRAKASH, S/O. M. KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OFFICE AT 28-453- E2, NEAR COLLECTORATE OFFICE, BEHIND PENNAR BHAVAN, ANANTHAPURAM - 515 001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAYADURGAM POLICE STATION, RAYADURGAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYADURGAM POLICE STATION, RAYADURGAM, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. B RAVI KUMAR, S/O. B. RAMA SWAMY, AGED NOT KNOWN, R/O. D.NO. 1-4/7 TO 9, V.R. STREET, BELLARY ROAD, RAYADURGAM TOWN, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): SRK, J WP No.22560 of 2023 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not initiating any action against the respondent No.6 for restoring possession of the secured asset bearing D. No. 1-1-4/7, 1-1-4/8, and 1-1-4/9, situated in Sy.No. 229 V.R. Street, Bellary Road, Rayadurga Village and Mandal, Ananthapuram District, despite the FIR No.155/2022 dated 27.04.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, 16 and 300-A of the Constitution of the India and consequently direct the respondents to restore possession of the scheduled property by providing necessary police protection. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G R SUDHAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: SRK, J WP No.22560 of 2023 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 22560 of 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date: 24.03.2026 sj SRK, J WP No.22560 of 2023 4 71 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.22560 of 2023 Date:24.03.2026 sj