APHC010431252013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1075/2013 Between: 1. V.S.R. NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATARATNAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS, R/O 23-6-133, PATNAM BAZAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI K VENKATESWARLU, GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR. 522 003 2. SRI A RAVINDER, CITY PLANNER/INFORMATION OFFICER, GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUNTUR. 522 003 3. ARAVAPALLI SAMASIVA RAO, S/O BRAHMANANDAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 5/2, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 522 002. 4. ARAVAPALLI RAGHAVENDRA KALYAN, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O 5/2, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 522 002. 5. ARAVAPALLI KRISHNA GURUKARTHIK, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/O 5/2, ARUNDALPET, GUNTUR. 522 002. ...CONTEMNOR(S): 2 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for deliberately flouting the order passed by this Hon'ble Court on 13.07.2011 in WPMP 18098 and 18099 of 2011 WP No.15068 of 2011 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A K KISHORE REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. AKA VENKATARAMANA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1075 OF 2013 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed complaining of violation of the Interim Order passed by this Court dated 13.07.2011 in W.P.M.P.Nos.18098 and 18099 of 2011 in W.P.No.15068 of 2011. 2. It transpires from the record that during the pendency of the Contempt Case, the main Writ Petition No.15068 of 2011 itself has been dismissed on merit, vide Order dated 16.04.2024, which is on record. The Final Order passed by this High Court dated 16.04.2024 is taken on record. 3. Having taken note of the same, this Court is of the view that this Contempt Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 31.03.2026 MNR 4 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1075 OF 2013 Dt: 31.03.2026 Mnr