Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23533 (KAR)

SRINIVASA RAO TALLA, v. CHIEF COMMISSIONER,

WP/2829/2025 · 2026-06-22

B M Shyam Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30724 WP No. 2829 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2829 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: SRINIVASA RAO TALLA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS FLAT NO 1014, MYKONOS, SOBHA CITY, RK HEGDENAGAR, BENGALURU-560 077. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KALGI.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. CHIEF COMMISSIONER, BBMP CORPORATION OFFICE NR CIRCLE, BENGALURU-560002. 2. SOBHA LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN SOBHA DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.) A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANY ACT 1956 SARJAPUR-MARATHAHALLI OUTER RING ROAD (ORR) DEVARABISANAHALLI, BELLANDUR POST, BANGALORE - 560103 (REPRESENTED BY MANAGING DIRECTOR) Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30724 WP No. 2829 of 2025 3. THE SECRETARY KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY SECOND FLOOR SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK 3RD CROSS ROAD, CSI COMPOUND, MISSION RD, SAMPANGI RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MONESH KUMAR K B., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MADHUKAR DESHPANDE., ADVOCATE FOR R2; SRI. RAJASHEKAR.K., ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE KHATA BIFURCATION VIDE NEW KHATA NUMBER 40/7/1, 9/1, 9/2, 62/2, 62/3/1, DATED 15-11- 2017(ANNEXURE G); QUASH THE KRERA REGISTRATION ACCORDED TO SOBHA ATHENA VIDE KRERA REGISTRATION NO. PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/200526/003430 DATED 26-05-2020 (ANNEXURE F). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30724 WP No. 2829 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri Anil Kalgi, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has filed a memo which reads as under: “The Petitioner respectfully submits as follows: 1. The above writ petition was filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent No.1 (BBMP) to consider the petitioner's complaint dated 25.01.2023/09.02.2024 and to cancel the illegal Khata bifurcation dated 15.11.2017 2. During the pendency of the above Writ Petition, the Zonal Commissioner, BBMP, Yelahanka Zone, has passed a final order dated 18.06.2025 (produced as Annexure R7 by Respondent No.2), rejecting the petitioner's complaint. 3. In light of the said order, the relief of mandamus sought in the above writ petition has become infructuous. The petitioner intends to challenge the said order dated 18.06.2025 in accordance with law. 4. The petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the above Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by the Zonal Commissioner, BBMP, Yelahanka Zone. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:30724 WP No. 2829 of 2025 5. No interim orders have been passed in the above writ petition in favour of the petitioner. The respondents will not be prejudiced by the withdrawal. Wherefore, the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: [a] Permit the petitioner to withdraw W.P. No.2829/2025 [b] Grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the order dated 18.06.2025 passed by the Zonal Commissioner, BBMP, Yelahanka Zone; and [c] Pass such other orders as deemed fit.” The memo is accepted, and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty to file a fresh petition subject to all just exceptions. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE AN/-