Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23533 (AP)

Sri Akula Dinesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6294/2021 · 2026-02-11

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010436832021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6294/2021 Between: 1.SRI AKULA DINESH,, S/O LATE RAJA SEKHAR, 29Y, D.NO. 10-371-5, BESIDE B.C. BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPADU, GUDIVADA, K.DT. 2.SMT. AKULA RANI,, W/O. LATE RAJA SEKHAR, 48, HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 10/371-5, BESIDE B.C.BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DT. 3.MS. AKULA MOUNIKA, D/O. LATE RAJA SEKHAR, 24Y, D.NO. 10/371- 5, BESIDE B.C.BOYS HOSTEL, NAGAVARAPPADU, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NIDAMARRU POLICE STATION, NIDAMARRU, W.G. DT. THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, A.P. 2.SARIPALLI MARY JYOTHSNA, W/O. DINESH, 29Y, D.NO. 1-94, R AND B ROAD, ENEKAPALLI NIDAMARRU MANDAL, W.G.DT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.M L ALI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the case against the Petitioners was ended in acquittal vide judgment in C.C.No.797/2021 on 06.04.2024. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dated: 12.02.2026 VTS