Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23532 (KAR)

MR GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD v. THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE

WP/18566/2026 · 2026-06-23

Suraj Govindaraj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31097 WP No. 18566 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 18566 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS SON OF MR. GOWNI DAYANAND GOUD RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 41, HUDA ENCLAVE ROAD, MO. 70, JOURNALIST COLONY, NEAR ANDHRA JYOTHI OFFICE, SHAKPET, HYDERABAD, JUBILEE HILLS, TELANGANA - 500 033 2. M/S. SHREYA HOMES, A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN, HAVING PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT PLOT NO. 5, KANNAMANGALA VILLAGE, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT - 560 067 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS .V, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY NO.1/14, 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU 560027 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31097 WP No. 18566 of 2026 2. MR. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATIL, S/O MR. VASANTHA RAO MAJOR, RESIDING AT NO. D16/1/A, OPPOSITE MERIDIAN ELITE ROAD, 19 PANCHAVATHI COLONY, MANIKONDA NEAR SHUTTLE COURT/PARK, TELANGANA - 500 089 3. MRS. GOWNI ANISHA, WIFE OF MR. GOWNI SRIDHAR GOUD AGED MAJOR, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 41, HUDA ENCLAVE ROAD, MO. 70, JOURNALIST COLONY, NEAR ANDHRA JYOTHI OFFICE, SHAKPET, HYDERABAD, JUBILEE HILLS, TELANGANA - 500 033 …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 08/06/2026 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1 IN COMPLAINT BEARING NO. CMP/1496/2026 VIDE ANNEXURE - A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (a) Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, to set aside the Impugned Order dated 08/06/2026 passed by the Respondent No.1 in Complaint bearing No.CMP/1496/2026 vide Annexure-A; - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31097 WP No. 18566 of 2026 (b) Consequently, issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to dismiss the complaint filed by the Respondent No.2 before the Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Bench 5) by allowing the Applications filed by the petitioners in Complaint bearing No.CMP/1496/2026; (Annexure-A); (c) In alternative to the prayer (b) issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the Respondent No.1 to consider the Applications along with objections filed by the Petitioners Complaint bearing No.CMP/1496/2026 vide Annexure-K, L & M. (d) Grant any other relief that this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice and equity. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo, seeking permission of the Court to dismiss the writ petition as having become infructuous. The said memo reads as follows: "The counsel for the Petitioners herein most humbly submits as follows: That the Petitioners have filed the present petition assailing the Impugned Order dated 08/06/2026 passed by the Respondent No.1 in Complaint bearing No.CMP/1946/2026 vide Annexure-A. However, the Respondent No.1 herein has already passed final order in the aforesaid complaint, as such, the present petition does not survive for consideration. In view of the same, the present petition may be disposed of as having become infructuous, in the interest of justice and equity." - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31097 WP No. 18566 of 2026 3. Placing the memo on record, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE NBM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16