Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23529 (JHR)

PRADEEP KUMAR SINHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

C.M.P./961/2025 · 2026-08-14

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24578 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.961 of 2025 ------ 1. Pradeep Kumar Sinha, son of Sri Nand Kishore Prasad (Freedom Fighter), resident of Awwal Mohalla, Chatra, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 2. Amit Kumar Akela, son of Sri Vidya Nand Prasad, resident of Village Kathautiya, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 3. Satyendra Kumar Pandit, son of Sri Kailash Pati Narayan, resident of near SDO Office, Chour Mohalla, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 4. Manik Kumar Mishra, son of Late Sachinand Mishra, resident of Village Kathautiya, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 5. Subbir Kumar, son of Ishwardeo Pandey, resident of Awwal Mohalla, Old Court, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 6. Ravi Prasad, son of Sri Baleshwar Prasad, resident of 98 Awwal Mohalla, near B.O. Office, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 7. Md. Abdal, son of Md. Rahim, resident of Wadi E Irfan, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, resident of Project Building, P.O. + P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3. Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Indian Red Cross Society, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. 4. The Sub Divisional Officer-cum-the Vice Chairman, Indian Red Cross Society-cum-Sub Divisional Officer, Chatra, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Ranchi. 5. Raj Kumar Agarwal, Secretary, Indian Red Cross Society, resident of Chatra, P.O. + P.S. Chatra, District Chatra. … … Opposite Parties ------ For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the O.P.(s) : Mr. Ashish Kumar Shekhar, AC to SC (L&C)-II ------- CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ 04 /14.08.2026 Heard the parties. 2. This Civil Misc. Petition has been preferred for restoration of W.P.(C) No.2034 of 2019, which was dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 01.11.2022, for removing the surviving defects. 2026:JHHC:24578 2 3. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that due to inadvertence, the defects could not be removed. He undertakes that the defects will be removed within two weeks from today itself. 4. Learned counsel representing the opposite parties does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel representing the petitioners, this Civil Misc. Petition is allowed. The W.P.(C) No.2034 of 2019, is restored to its original file. 6. It is made clear that if the surviving defects are still not removed, the same should be removed within two weeks, otherwise this order will not be given effect to. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 14th August, 2026 Prashant. Cp-2 Uploaded on 19.08.2026