Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23521 (AP)

AMPOLU SRINIVASA RAO v. M ADI NARAYANA

CC/2294/2025 · 2026-03-15

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010430852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2294/2025 Between: 1. AMPOLU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O RAMAYYA, AGED 46 YEARS, LECTURER IN CHEMISTRY, GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, PALASA, R/O CHINNABADAM VILLAGE, PALASA MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. M ADI NARAYANA, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR INTERMEDIATE, EDUCATION, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM. 2. NARASIMHA MURTHY, PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT JUNIOR COLLEGE, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to summon, prosecute, and punish the Respondents under Sec 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilful and deliberate violation of the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed in IA.No.1 of 2025 in WP.No. 15983 of 2025, dt. 15-07-2025 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the petitioner to implead the proposed Respondent No.3/ Contemnor as 3rd Respondent/ contemnor in C.C.No.2294/2025 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA 2. The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Contempt Case No.2294 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-compliance of the Interim Order, dated 15.07.2025 passed by this Court in I.A.No.01 of 2025 in W.P.No.15983 of 2025. 2. It was submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as for the Respondents that the interim order passed by this Court in I.A.No.01 of 2025 in W.P.No.15983 of 2025, dated 15.07.2025 was complied with by the Respondents. 3. In that view, as no cause survives for adjudication, the Contempt Case is closed. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 16.03.2026 chs 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY 91 Contempt Case No.2294 of 2025 Date: 16.03.2026 chs