Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23520 (MAD)

Muhammad Muneera v. The Regional Passport Officer

WP(MD)/7439/2026 · 2026-03-18

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 Muhammad Muneera ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ulaa Street, Race course Road, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Keelakarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to issue a passport to petitioner by processing her application in File No.MDA075023540625 based on petitioner representation dated 24.06.2025 within a time limit stipulated by this Honble Court and for other relief and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.B.Arun For R1 : Mr.R.Ramanatha Sethupathi Standing Counsel For R2 : Mr.K.Gnansekaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the 1st respondent to issue a passport to the petitioner by processing his application in File No.MDA075023540625 based on petitioner representation dated 24.06.2025. 2. Heard Mr.B.Arun, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.R.Ramanathasethupathi, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice for R1 and Mr.K.Gnanasekaran, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who takes notice for R2. 3. When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that in view of the pendency of the criminal case, the same was not considered. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that initially the petitioner was arrayed as an accused in Cr.No.16 of 2025, however, after investigation, in the alteration report, the petitioner's name has been deleted from the case. In view thereof, the same is no longer an impediment for the issue of the passport. 5. The writ petition is allowed on the following terms:- i. Within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a web copy of the order, the 1st respondent shall process the application and issue a passport to the petitioner, if there is no other impediment. ii. No costs. 18.03.2026 Index: Yes Speaking Order: Yes Neutral Citation: No rgm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. rgm To 1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, Bharathi Ulaa Street, Race course Road, Madurai. 2. The Inspector of Police, Keelakarai Police Station, Ramanathapuram. W.P.(MD).No.7439 of 2026 18.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis