Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23507 (CHH)

SHRI SWASTH RAJ PAMBHOI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/3128/2026 · 2026-06-24

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26054 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3128 of 2026 • Shri Swasth Raj Pambhoi S/o Papaiya Aged About 32 Years Caste Rajgond R/o Village Bhatpalli, Tehsil Bhopalpatnam, District- Bijapur, (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur (C.G.). 2. The Collector Bijapur, District- Bijapur (C.G.). 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bhopalpatnam District- Bijapur (C.G.). 4. Shri Jarkhan S/o Late Noorakhmaan Khan R/o Bhopalpatnam Tehsil Bhopalpatnam District- Bijapur (C.G.). 5. Shri Babar Khan S/o Late Noorakhmaan Khan R/o Bhopalpatnam Tehsil Bhopalpatnam District- Bijapur (C.G.). 6. Shri Bahadur Khan S/o Late Noorakhmaan Khan R/o Bhopalpatnam Tehsil Bhopalpatnam District- Bijapur (C.G.). 7. Shri Lalshah Khan S/o Late Noorakhmaan Khan R/o Bhopalpatnam Tehsil Bhopalpatnam District- Bijapur (C.G.). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Verma, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. Shreyansh Mehta, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before the appropriate authority, where the alternative remedy lies. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 Further, he prays that some direction may be issued to the authorities concerned to consider the delay in filing the appeal. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection with regard to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. Considering the aforesaid submission made by the parties and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, petitioner is permitted to file appropriate application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal/revision and the concerned authorities are directed to consider the same in accordance with law. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 6. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha