Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23506 (PNJ)

PARMINDER SINGH @ JASHAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/28559/2026 · 2026-05-26

N S Shekhawat

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

213-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28559-2026 Date of Decision:26.05.2026 Parminder Singh @ Jashan …Petitioner Vs. State of Punjab …Respondent Coram : Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.S.Shekhawat Present : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Rana, Sr.DAG, Punjab. ***** N.S.Shekhawat J. (Oral) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 482 of B.N.S.S with a prayer to grant anticipatory bail to him in case FIR No.322, dated 19.12.2022, under Sections 323,324,341,506,379,148,149 of IPC, {115(2), 118(1), 126(2),351(2), 303(2),191(3),190 of B.N.S}, registered at Police Station Sadar Nabha, Patiala. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of the order dated 19.05.2026, passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 3. Learned State counsel also submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no longer required for further investigation. 4. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for the parties, the interim order dated 19.05.2026 is made absolute. The petitioner shall continue to join the investigation, as and when called by the Investigating Officer. The petitioner shall also abide by the conditions as specified under HITESH 2026.05.26 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRM-M-28559-2026 -2 Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S. (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) 26.05.2026 JUDGE hitesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No HITESH 2026.05.26 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh