SURAJ GOPE@ SURAJ YADAV @SURAJ MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./7543/2026 · 2026-08-12
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23504 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23504 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:24088 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.7543 of 2026
------ Suraj Gope @ Suraj Yadav @ Suraj Mahto, aged about 24 years, S/o Ramdhan Mahto, Resident of Village-Childag, P.O. & P.S.-Ratu, Dist.-Ranchi.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 12-08-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.130 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 386, 387, 388, 455 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of Arms Act and Section 17 of CLA Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner trespassed to the house of the informant by scaling over the boundary wall and demanded money in the name of PLFI Organization. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has not put on TIP; even though he is not named in the FIR. It is also submitted that though charge sheet has been submitted in this case, but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.06.2024 as is evident from para-01 of this bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on
bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi in connection with Chanho P.S. Case No.130 of 2020 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 12/08/2026 Abhiraj/