Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2350 (PAT)

Gulab Paswan @ Gulab Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25080/2026 · 2026-04-22

Purnendu Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25080 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2025 Thana- NAYA RAM NAGAR District- Munger ====================================================== 1. Gulab Paswan @ Gulab Kumar S/o Ram Bilash Paswan R/o Village/Mohalla - Chamangarh, P.S - Naya Ram Nagar, District - Munger. 2. Kundan Paswan @ Kundan Kumar S/o Ram Bilash Paswan R/o Village/Mohalla - Chamangarh, P.S - Naya Ram Nagar, District - Munger. 3. Rajani Devi W/o Ram Bilas Paswan R/o Village/Mohalla - Chamangarh, P.S - Naya Ram Nagar, District - Munger. 4. Ram Bilash Paswan S/o Reso Paswan R/o Village/Mohalla - Chamangarh, P.S - Naya Ram Nagar, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 103, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. Allegation is of commission of murder of the son of the informant in his sasural. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25080 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3 have falsely been implicated in the case. Petitioner nos.1 and 2 are brother in law and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased. Informant is not the eye witness of the occurrence and merely on suspicion, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioners have clean antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the nature of allegation against the petitioner nos. 3 and 4 who are mother-in-law and father-in-law of the deceased, I am not inclined to enlarge them on pre-arrest bail. 7. So far as petitioner nos. 1 and 2 are concerned, considering the nature of allegation against them to be general and omnibus, they are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Munger in connection with Naya Ram Nagar P.S. Case No. 103 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25080 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 8. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para-3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force. 9. The bail application stands disposed of. mantreshwar/- (Purnendu Singh, J) U T