GHULAM NABI RATHER v. JAVAID AHMAD DAR, INVESTIGATION OFFICER, SCW P/S CRIME BRANCH KMR
CCP(S)/75/2026 · 2026-04-07
Sanjay Dhar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 235 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 235 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
158 Supp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 75/2026 in[CRM(M) 646/2025])
GHULAM NABI RATHER
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. M Sultan, Advocate.
V/s JAVAID AHMAD DAR, INVESTIGATION OFFICER, SCW P/S CRIME BRANCH KMR
….. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Dhar, Judge
ORDER 07.04.2026
There is no averment in the contempt petition that the petitioner was called by the Investigating Agency after stay of investigation by the court. In the absence of any such averment, no case for proceeding against the respondent is made out. The petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case he is called by the Investigating Agency during the operation of the stay order.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 07.04.2026 Aasif