Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 235 (ALL)

RAM NARESH SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/5901/2026 · 2026-03-18

Ajay Bhanot, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5901 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. Learned A.G.A. on the basis of instructions submits that pursuant to the investigation the charge-sheet has been filed and the cognizance of the offence has been taken by the learned trial court. The charges have also been framed against the accused persons. No provision of law has been shown to enable this Court to exercise discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to mandamus of police authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner. However, it is open to the petitioner to avail his remedies before the learned trial court under the B.N.S.S. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. March 19, 2026 Ashish Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Ram Naresh Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHISH NAYAN TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad