Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23495 (CHH)

PRANJAL YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2645/2026 · 2026-06-28

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:26330 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2645 of 2026 Pranjal Yadav S/o Santosh Yadav, Aged About 23 Years R/o -Ram Nagar, Ward No.19, Supela Bhilai District -Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur C.G. 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instructions (D.P.I.) Through Its Director, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District -Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Hemchand Yadav University Through Its Registrar, Office At Hemchand Yadav University, Raipur Nakar, Durg , District -Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Principal Rungta College Of Science And Technology Kokha-Kurud Road , Bhilai, District -Durg Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Anil Tawadkar, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1 and 2 : Mr. S.S. Choubey, Government Advocate For Respondents No.3 : Ms. Deeksha Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Neeraj Choubey, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Avinash Chand Sahu, Advocate YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.06.29 16:49:30 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 29.06.2026 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that, in view of the subsequent developments, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents fairly concur with the aforesaid submission. 3. In view of the above, as nothing survives for adjudication, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh