Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23494 (JHR)

JYOTI @ JYOTI SAGWAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3837/2026 · 2026-08-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:24950 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 3818 of 2026 With A.B.A. No. 3837 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3818 of 2026 Kanakamedala V Ramakrishna @ Kanakamedala Venkata Ramakrishna, aged about 40 years, son of Late K. Ravindra Nath, resident of Dipatoli Army Cantt. P.O., P.S. & District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shweta Ramkrishna, aged about 37 years, wife of Kanakamedala V Ramakrishna, resident of Dipatoli Army Cantt., P.O. & P.S. Khelgaon, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Opposite Parties With A.B.A. No. 3837 of 2026 Jyoti @ Jyoti Sagwan, aged about 34 years, resident of 194 Kotla Village, near Baniyan Tree, Mayur Vihar Phase 1, Patparganj, East Delhi, P.O. & P.S. Patparganj, District- Delhi- 110091 … Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shweta Ramkrishna, aged about 37 years, wife of Kanakamedala V Ramakrishna, resident of Dipatoli Army Cantt., P.O. & P.S. Khelgaon, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) … Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners: Ms. Mohini Gupta, Advocate (In both cases) For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl.P.P. (In A.B.A.-3818/26) Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P. (In A.B.A.-3837/26) For the Informant : Mr. Rohit Sinha, Advocate (In both cases) Mr. Vijay Shankar, Advocate Mr. Paritosh Rai, Advocate Mr. Imran Hassan, Advocate ----- 05/19.08.2026 These matters relate to Khelgaon P.S. Case No.53 of 2025, pending in the Court of the learned J.M.F.C. XXVIII, Ranchi. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw these applications with liberty to move before the learned Court by way of filing appropriate petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State in respective cases and learned counsel for the informant have got no objection. ( 2026:JHHC:24950 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 3818 of 2026 With A.B.A. No. 3837 of 2026 4. Accordingly, these applications are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is made clear that if the petitioners move before the learned Court by way of filing appropriate petition, that will be decided in accordance with law without prejudice to this order. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 19th August, 2026 Ajay/