2026:JHHC:24223 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7536 of 2026 Diljan Ansari, aged about 46 years, son of Late Suleman Ansari, Resident of Village Nowdiha, Tola Banstora, P.O & P.S.- Chandankiyari, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kumar Rai, Advocate Mr. Harsh Ladia, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, Advocate --- 04/13th August 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Chandankiyari P.S. Case No. 14/2026 for the offence registered under Sections 308(3), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 3(5) of BNS, now said to have been pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.06.2026 and charge-sheet has already been submitted. The learned counsel submits that there was case and counter-case between two groups and persons from both the groups sustained injuries. The co- accused, namely, Taleb Ansari and Shahban Ansari have been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 3737/2026 vide order dated 13.07.2026. However, the petitioner did not press his anticipatory bail application as he was apprehended. The case of the petitioner is on better footing, inasmuch as, initial assault, as per the FIR, is by Taleb Ansari. 3. Learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer for bail. 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the charge-sheet has already been submitted; similarly situated co-accused have been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail by a co- 2026:JHHC:24223 2 ordinate Bench of this Court; both the sides are agnates; there is land dispute between the parties; there is case and counter-case between the parties and both the sides suffered injuries, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bokaro in connection with Chandankiyari P.S. Case No. 14/2026, subject to the following conditions: - (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner would deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his Mobile Number before the learned court below, which he shall not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 5. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 6. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e- mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 13.08.2026 Uploaded On: 13.08.2026 Mukul/-