1 2026:CGHC:830-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 2 of 2026 Vilas Chelak @ Kanu S/o Late Udayshankar Chelak Aged About 25 Years R/o Ward No. 07 Purani Basti, Balodabazar, P.S. - City Kotwali, Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs (Police), New Raipur, C.G. 2 - Collector District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 3 - Joint Collector District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintendent Of Police District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh 5 - Station House Officer P.S.- City Kotwali, Balodabazar, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr.Dharmesh Shrivastava, Dy.A.G. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 7.1.2026 1. Heard Mr.Pragalbha Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner as BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2026.01.07 18:25:01 +0530 2 well as Mr.Dharmesh Shrivastava, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the respondents. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “10.1 Το kindly the impugned set-aside/quash order/Show cause notice dated 23.09.2025 (Annexure P-1), passed by the Respondent No.03; 10.2 To kindly direct the Respondent No.1 & 2 to conduct enquiry into the matter and take disciplinary actions against the respondent No.4 & 5; 10.3 to impose appropriate cost on the Respondent authorities for illegally passing the impugned order/show cause notice and for harassing and humiliating the petitioner. 10.4 Any other relief(s), direction(s), which Hon'ble the Court deems fit, and proper, in the circumstances of the case.” 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for redressal of his grievance. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu