Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2348 (RAJ)

TASVEERA URF KASHMEERA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3046/2026 · 2026-04-15

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3046/2026 Tasveera Urf Kashmeera W/o Amarsingh, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Tilhari Ka Pura, Tan Tighriya, Police Station Naimandi, Hindauncity, District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jiya UR Rahman For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Iltab Hussain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 15/04/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.240/2025 registered at Police Station-New Mandi Hindaun, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 80(2), 85, 238(a) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady. He submits that the charge-sheet has been filed against the co-accused, Amar Singh, in which the complainant and the father of the deceased have turned hostile. He further submits that a compromise has been arrived at [2026:RJ-JP:15611] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3046/2026] between the parties. He submits that the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant has acceded to the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioner and has raised no objection if the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is cooperating with the investigation of the case, but without commenting on the merits/demerits thereof, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Tasveera Urf Kashmeera W/o Amarsingh, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and [2026:RJ-JP:15611] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3046/2026] (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/62