Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2348 (PAT)

Shiv Kumar @ Shivji Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/1463/2026 · 2026-04-23

Sandeep Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1463 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2025 Thana- Lakho District- Begusarai ====================================================== Shiv Kumar @ Shivji Kumar S/o Pashupati Singh R/o Village - Bhairwar, P.S - Lakho, District - Begusarai ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Badal Kumar S/o Jogi Paswan R/o Village - Mainka, W. No. 13, P.S - Lakho, District - Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Respondent/s : Mr.Usha Kumari 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 23-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 12.03.2026 passed by the learned learned Court of Exclusive Special Judge-SC/ST (POA) Act, Begusarai whereby the bail application of the appellant in connection with Lakho P.S. Case No. 185 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 308(3), 109, 352, 351(2), 3/3(5) of the BNS and under Sections 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (POA) Act, was rejected. 3. The appellant and others are said to have abused the informant and his cousin brother by taking caste name and have also assaulted them by Lathi, Danda and Road and a Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1463 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026 2/2 golden chain was also snatched. 4. The appellant is in custody since 29.01.2026. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the specific allegation of assault is against one Shubham Kumar and not the appellant. 6. Learned Special P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the appellant. 7. Considering the facts of the case and also considering the nature of allegation levelled against the appellant, this application is allowed and accordingly, the order dated 12.03.2026, is hereby set aside. 8. Let the appellant be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Lakho P.S. Case No. 185 of 2025. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U