BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS THROUGH ACS FINANCE
/16946/2026 · 2026-05-26
Sandeep Moudgil
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23476 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
139
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.16946 of 2026
Date of decision: 26.05.2026
Balbir Singh and others
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Present :- Mr. Sunil Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate
for the petitioners.
***** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J.(Oral)
1.
The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 20.06.2025 (Annexure P-4), declining the benefit of Leave Encashment beyond 300 days, by merely saying that the employees of Haryana Govt. are governed solely by the Rules and Regulation framed by the Govt. of Haryana.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition without pressing the same with liberty to challenge Rule 8.21 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules, Volume I.
3.
Prayer is accepted.
4.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 26.05.2026
JUDGE seema Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes
Whether Reportable: No SEEMA SHARMA 2026.05.30 12:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment