Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23476 (AP)

Ch. V. Nageshwara Rao v. p. Balagandhara Srinivasa Rao

CC/1352/2018 · 2026-03-08

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010426952018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1352/2018 Between: 1. CH. V. NAGESHWARA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS OCC CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE BHOGAPURAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., CHODAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. P BALAGANDHARA SRINIVASA RAO, President, The Bhogapuram Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society Ltd., Chodavaram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent for Contempt of Court for flouting violating the orders passed by the Hon'ble Justice A. Rajasheker Reddy of this Hon'ble High Court in W.P. No. 27358 of 2017 dated 17-08-2017 under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of the Courts Act and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1352 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: Instant Contempt Case has been filed alleging violation of Interim Order dated 17.08.2017 in WP No.27358 of 2017 passed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Hyderabad. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri L.V.S.Nagaraju, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the main Writ Petition itself was disposed of by Order dated 31.10.2025, wherein it is recorded that the Interim Order dated 17.08.2017 has been complied with, as the respondent authorities has paid the requisite amounts to the petitioner. As such, petitioner is not inclined to pursue the contempt case. 3. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 09.03.2026 PSA 4