Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23475 (JHR)

MAHESH KISKU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6547/2026 · 2026-08-12

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:24048 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6547 of 2026 Mahesh Kisku, Aged about 21 years, Son of Johan Kisku, Resident of Tulsipur, Post Office- Lalmatiya, Police Station- Lalmatiya, District- Godda (Jharkhand) … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Kr. Agarwal, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Anuj Burman, Advocate For the State : None --- 07/12.08.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2026 arising out of Meharma PS Case No. 45 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 522 of 2026, registered for the offence under sections 69 and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2026 and charge has been framed under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 on 16.06.2026. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner thereafter submits that as per the case of the informant, who happens to be the victim, she was having relationship with the petitioner earlier and when he refused to marry, the case was lodged. 5. The statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been placed on record which reveals that the victim has stated that she was having relationship with the petitioner and when the petitioner refused to marry, she ultimately lodged the case. 6. Learned counsel for the informant, on instructions, has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 2026:JHHC:24048 2 7. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and charge having been framed, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda in connection with Sessions Trial No. 244 of 2026 arising out of Meharma PS Case No. 45 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. No. 522 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 8. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 9. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:12.08.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:13.08.2026