Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2347 (RAJ)

ARJUN @ BABA S/O SHRI PURUSHOTAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4528/2026 · 2026-04-22

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:17020] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 4528/2026 Arjun @ Baba S/o Shri Purushotam, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 2 Nayako Ka Mohhala Kasba Surajgarh P.s. Suragarh District Jhunjhunu. (Accused Is At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankush Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 22/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 36/2023 registered at Police Station Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu for the offences under Sections 341, 323 and 324 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the petitioner’s first and second bail applications were dismissed as withdrawn. In the second bail application liberty was granted to file a fresh bail application after the statement of the injured witness Vishal Nayak. It is argued that Vishal Nayak has been examined and during his cross-examination, he deviated from the prosecution’s case, stating that his injuries were the result of an accident. It is further contended that the statement of the injured witness PW-4, Vishal Nayak, is unreliable. The accused-petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:17020] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4528/2026] is in custody for one year and eight months and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. PW-4 Vishal Nayak the injured witness has stated in his cross-examination that he sustained injuries due to an accident with another vehicle. Considering the statement of PW-4 Vishal Nayak (injured), along with the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody for a period of one year and eight months and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Arjun @ Baba S/o Shri Purushotam, in connection with FIR No. 36/2023 registered at Police Station Surajgarh District Jhunjhunu shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /19