S. PAVAN KUMAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT & ANOTHER v. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, KURNNOL & 2 OTHERS
WP/23988/2013 · 2026-03-29
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23469 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 23469 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010429252013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23988/2013 Between:
1. S. PAVAN KUMAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT & ANOTHER, S/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, EX-ASSISTANT LINEMAN, OPERATION SECTION O/O ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
2. N. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O POLIMERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, JUNIOR LINEMAN, OPERATION SECTION, 0/O ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, MAHANANDI, NANDYAL, KURNOOL.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER APCPDCL KURNNOL 2 OTHERS, OPERATION, APCPDCL, KURNOOL.
2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION APCPDCL NANDYAL KURNOOL, -
3. THE DEPUTY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OPERATION APCPDCL NANDYAL, -
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. P LAKSHMA REDDY
2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
3. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL)
4. JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARI DEVI The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:-
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in pursuance of the interim direction dated 16.08.2013 the petitioners did not approach the respondents for re-engagement.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, as the petitioners on their own have not approached the respondents seeking re-engagement. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
Date.30.03.2026 SR