Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23469 (AP)

S. PAVAN KUMAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT & ANOTHER v. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, KURNNOL & 2 OTHERS

WP/23988/2013 · 2026-03-29

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010429252013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23988/2013 Between: 1. S. PAVAN KUMAR, KURNOOL DISTRICT & ANOTHER, S/O PULLAIAH AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, EX-ASSISTANT LINEMAN, OPERATION SECTION O/O ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. N. CHANDRASEKHAR REDDY, S/O POLIMERA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, JUNIOR LINEMAN, OPERATION SECTION, 0/O ASSISTANT ENGINEER, APCPDCL, MAHANANDI, NANDYAL, KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER APCPDCL KURNNOL 2 OTHERS, OPERATION, APCPDCL, KURNOOL. 2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION APCPDCL NANDYAL KURNOOL, - 3. THE DEPUTY ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OPERATION APCPDCL NANDYAL, - ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P LAKSHMA REDDY 2. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 3. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL) 4. JAGARLAMUDI KOTESWARI DEVI The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in pursuance of the interim direction dated 16.08.2013 the petitioners did not approach the respondents for re-engagement. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed, as the petitioners on their own have not approached the respondents seeking re-engagement. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.30.03.2026 SR