Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2346 (UTT)

GURBAJ SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/896/2026 · 2026-04-09

Alok Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2549 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 09th APRIL, 2026 WRIT PETITON NO. 896 of 2026 (M/S) Gurbaj Singh ..…Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others .…Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Mani Kumar, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, Additional No.1 Chief Standing Counsel. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. This Writ Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers :- “(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the court of Learned Sub- Divisional Magistrate/Assistant Collector (First Class) Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar to decide the Revenue Case/Appeal No-52/01 Year 2023-2024 Under Section 210 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901 “Mahanand and Another vs. Smt. Rachna Phutela and Another” (Annexure No-1) Page No- to Page No- expeditiously preferably within a period of two months, otherwise the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury. (ii) Issue any other or further order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case. (iii) Award the cost of petition.” 1 2026:UHC:2549 2. Heard Mr. Mani Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondent no.1. 3. The prayer no.1 has not been opposed by the respondent no.1. 4. Having heard, the learned Sub-Divisional- Magistrate/ Assistant Collector, Ist Class, Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to make an endeavour to decide the Revenue Appeal No.52/01 of the year 2023-2024, “Mahanand and Another vs. Smt. Rachna Phutela and Another”, as expeditiously as possible, as per law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to the parties. 5. The present Writ Petition No. 896 of 2026 (M/S) is disposed of accordingly. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merit of the case. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 09.04.2026 Pant 2