Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23457 (PAT)

Md. Ahsan @ Md. Ehshan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./33770/2026 · 2026-07-08

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33770 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2026 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Ahsan @ Md. Ehshan S/O Md. Abbas Resident of Village - Laheiraganj, P.S. Madhubani, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 08-07-2026 Heard Mr.Shailendra Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Anil Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 06.02.2026 in connection with Madhubani Cyber P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 05.02.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 337, 338, 339, 340(2), 341(1), 111,61(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 42(1),42(2),42(3)(c),42(3),(e),42(3)(f),42(6) and 43 of the Telecommunication Act, 2023 and Sections 66,66(c),66(D) & 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (I.T.Act). 3. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing cyber crime by supplying the SIM to co-accused Mandeep Kumar @ Mandeep Singh @ Rishu . 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33770 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 2/3 submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion and petitioner is so called owner of the mobile shop and he has no role at all in the present occurrence. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Mandeep Singh @ Rishu and except the aforesaid, nothing has come during investigation against the petitioner to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. 5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that it has come during investigation that the petitioner has supplied the SIM to co-accused person, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Mandeep Singh @ Rishu without paper and co- accused person, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Mandeep Singh @ Rishu has used the said SIM in the cyber crime and bail petition of co-accused person, namely, Mandeep Kumar @ Mandeep Singh @ Rishu has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 16.06.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.37280 of 2026. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Madhubani Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33770 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026 3/3 Cyber P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Madhubani. 7. Prayer is refused. Nitesh/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T