Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23454 (AP)

B. Rama Krishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22780/2017 · 2026-02-15

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010424432017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 22780 OF 2017 Between: 1. B. Rama Krishna, S/o. Muni Raju, Aged about 28 years, R/o.Ankannagudem Village & Post, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District. 2. S. Prakasa Rao, S/o. China Muthyalu, Aged about 36 years, R/o.Ankannagudem Village & Post, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. M. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Ganga Raju, Aged about 31 years, R/o.Dibbagudem Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District. 4. K. Gangadhara Rao, S/o. Muthyalu, Aged about 30 years, R/o.P.Kunkala Village, Polavaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 5. B. Venkatesh, S/o.Durga Rao, Aged about 30 years, R/o Ramachandrapuram Village, Jeelugumilli Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Health Medical & Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The A P Para Medical Board, Old Government Hospital, Near R.T.C. Complex, Vijayawada, Krishna District represented by its Secretary. ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the request of the Petitioners for registration of their Public Health and Sanitation Technology Course Certificates issued by Bethesda Institute of Health Sciences, Visakhapatnam as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the Petitioners are entitled for registration of their Public Health and Sanitation Technology Course Certificates and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 28055 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the god Respondent to take steps for registering the Public Health and Sanitation Technology Course Certificates of the Petitioners issued by Bethesda Institute of Health Sciences, Visakhapatnam and pass such other and further order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: KARUPOLU NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW(AP) The Court made the following order: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.22780 OF 2017 ORDER: The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not considering the request of the Petitioners for registration of their Public Health and Sanitation Technology Course Certificates issued by Bethesda Institute of Health Sciences, Visakhapatnam as wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the Petitioners are entitled for registration of their Public Health and Sanitation Technology Course Certificates and pass …..” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms.Mukundini, learned counsel representing Sri Ravi Kondaveeti, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that in view of subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous. 4 3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date:16.02.2026 Rns 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.22780 of 2017 Date:16.02.2026 Rns