IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42120 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- JAMALPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Rinki Devi @ Minki Devi Wife of Manish Ram Resident of village- Jhagarua Ward No 5, PS- Jamalpur, Distt -Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 30-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No.24 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 55 and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that Manish Ram assaulted with khanti on the neck of informant’s husband due to which he received serious injury and fell down. After that Bimla Devi and Raushan Ram assaulted with feet. It is further alleged that the khanti from which the assault was made by Manish Ram was given to him by this petitioner. It is further alleged that the injured succumbed to the injuries. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear that the main thrust of allegation is against Manish Ram who is alleged to have assaulted with khanti on the back side of the neck of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42120 of 2026(2) dt.30-06-2026 2/2 informant’s husband. In last part of the FIR it is stated that the khanti was handed over by this petitioner. It has further been submitted that there is no allegation of assault against this petitioner and that part of the FIR wherein the petitioner has been impleaded as super-addition. It has been submitted that the petitioner is a lady having no criminal antecedent and she is in judicial custody since 02.03.2026. 5. Countering this, learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail and has submitted that the deceased has been brutally killed and has received multiple injuries. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned J.M.F.C., Biraul, Darbhanga in connection with Jamalpur P.S. Case No.24 of 2026. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T