Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23451 (JHR)

RANJIT GAYALI @ RANJIT KUMAR GAYALI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4735/2026 · 2026-08-19

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:24983] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4735 of 2026 Ranjit Gayali @ Ranjit Kumar Gayali, aged about 46 Years, son of Fani Gayali @ Fanindra Gayali,resident of Village Brahmandiha, P.O. Tundoo, P.S. Madhuban, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. V.K. Vashistha, A.P.P. ------ 04/ 19.08.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(2), 132, 117(3) and 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. He next submits that 31 persons are named in the FIR and further 70 persons were present at the spot and in the similar circumstance, the other co-accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory bail in A.B.A. Nos. 3009, 4397 and 4432 of 2025. He further submits that for the same set of allegations, two FIRs have been registered. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of pelting stones upon the police officials. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that in identical situation, several other co- accused persons have already been provided the privilege of anticipatory [2026:JHHC:24983] -2- bail in the aforementioned A.B.As. and further there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of his surrender / arrest, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty-five thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 02 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-19.08.2026 Amitesh/-