Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23445 (AP)

J.VENKATA RAMANA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. v. K. PRABHAKAR CHOWDARY, VIJAYAWADA & ANOTHER

CC/1028/2017 · 2026-02-11

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010430612017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1028/2017 Between: 1. J.VENKATA RAMANA, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST., S/O. SIMHACHALAM, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: TECHNICHAL ASSISTANT, MGNREGS, R/O. H. NO.7-116/4, NGO COLONY, KOTHURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, ANAKAPALLI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K PRABHAKAR CHOWDARY VIJAYAWADA ANOTHER, OCCUPATION: MEMBER SECRETARY, SRDS, 0/O THE COMMISSIONER, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 5TH FLOOR, D. NO.29-6- 6/1, NAKKALA ROAD, SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA-2, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. MR A KALYAN CHAKRAVARTHI, OCCUPATION: PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under sections 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful disobedience of the orders passed by Sri Justice P.Naveen Rao in WPMP No.12120 of 2017 in WP No.9781 of 2017, dt.20-03-2017 and to pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V V SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SPL C FOR NREGS(M S R CHANDRA MURTHY) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1028/2017 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 20.03.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.12120 of 2017 in W.P. No.9781 of 2017. 2. When the matter is taken up, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, fairly submits that the main writ petition was disposed on 24.10.2024. In view of the disposal of the main writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondent. 3. Accordingly, recording the above submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 12.02.2026 S D P 4 197 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1028/2017 12.02.2026 W S D P