Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5497-2026 (O&M) -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118
CRWP-5497-2026 (O&M)
Decided on: 26.05.2026 VIJAY KUMAR
…...Petitioner Versus STATE OF U.T. CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS …...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Ms. Indu Bala, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vaibhav Mittal, Addl. P.P. U.T., Chandigarh.
**** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (Oral)
1.
The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus seeking directions to the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner and her family members at the hands of private respondents.
2.
At the outset, learned counsel for the U.T. submitted that the present matter pertains to a property dispute between the parties and at the behest of the complainant/petitioner, the complaint lodged by him, has been closed.
3.
In view of the statement made on behalf of the learned State counsel, nothing survives in the present petition and as such, the same is hereby disposed of.
4.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 26.05.2026 Sonia Puri
Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO
Whether Reportable:
YES/NO SONIA PURI 2026.05.28 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document