Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23431 (AP)

ONTERU NAGENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/21692/2024 · 2026-01-19

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOs: 16222 OF 2019, 21692 OF 2024 AND 19282 OF 2025 The Court made the following ORAL COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri Kochiri Raja Shekar, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioners in W.P.Nos.16222 of 2019 and 21692 of 2024, Sri Srinu Babu, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development and Sri A.S.C.Bose, Ld. Standing Counsel for the Municipal Corporations and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development has filed Memo No.57178/H2/2018 dated 21.12.2025 issued by the Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development (H) Department. Copy of it is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. The relevant portion of the Memo is usefully extracted hereunder: “2. The DTCP is also requested to the above consideration for preparation of the in-principle layout pattern by NMC and cancellation of the DTCP, Andhra Pradesh, approved layout vide L.P.No.95/91 shall be taken up only upon fulfillment of the following conditions: 1. Petitioners in the various pending court cases relating to the subject site shall withdraw their petitions and submit affidavits to that effect. 2. Directions issued in court cases where final judgment has already been delivered shall be duly complied with. 3. The Director of Town and Country Planning, A.P., Mangalagiri, Guntur shall take necessary action accordingly.” 3. It is stated in Para No.2 of the Memo No.57178/H2/2018 dated 21.12.2025 that the Director of Town and Country Planning had been requested to prepare the in-principle layout pattern by NMC and cancellation 2 of the approved layout vide L.P.No.95/91 subject to the withdrawing of various pending cases relating to the subject and submit Affidavits to that effect. 4. In response to the above Memo No.57178/H2/2018 dated 21.12.2025, the Writ Petitioners seeks to withdraw these Writ Petitions with a hope that the Respondents would fulfil the undertaking as mentioned in Memo No.57178/H2/2018, dated 21.12.2025. Having noted the same, this Court deems it appropriate to permit these Writ Petitioners to be withdrawn these Writ Petitions, with liberty to approach this Court once again if the needful is not done by the Respondents within a reasonable time, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of uploading of this common order on the web-site of this Court. 5. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty granted above. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 20.01.2026 MNR 3 90 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOs: 16222 OF 2019, 21692 OF 2024 & 19282 OF 2025 Dt: 20.01.2026 Mnr