Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2343 (ALL)

CHAKRADHARI YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

NA529/2269/2026 · 2026-05-05

Prashant Mishra I

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2269 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to direct the Upper Civil Judge (Junior Division) 3rd Jaunpur, to decide the Misc. Case No. 765 of 2020 (New Case No.303 of 2021) (Chakradhari Yadav Vs. Ram Sundar Maurya & Others) under Sections 166, 167, 323, 504 & 506 of I.P.C. P.S.- Navediya, District- Jaunpur, pending in the court of Upper Civil Judge (Junior Division) 3rd, Jaunpur. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice. Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides. With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 feels aggrieved, he may approach this Court. May 6, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Yadav, Hemant Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) Chakradhari Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad