APHC010429962014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 1884/2014 Between: 1. M. SIVA BRAHMANANDA REDDY, GUNTUR., E.51746, H.NO.4-5- 32/52/A, VIDYANAGAR LG LANE, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE REGL P F COMMISSIONER HYD 3 OTRS, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, BARKATPURA, HYDERABAD - 500 027. 2. THE ASST PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERPENSION, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION, REGIONAL OFFICE, PARK ROAD, KRISHNA NAGAR, GUNTUR-522 006. 3. THE SECRETARY, A.P.S.R.T.C., PROVIDENT FUND (TRUST), BUS BHAVAN, MUSHIRABAD, HYDERABAD- 500 624. 4. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C., GUNTUR REGION, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Pension Payment Order No.GR/GNT/ 00041276 dated 30.05.2013 of the 2nd respondent to the extent of not adding 2 years weightage as per Para 10(2) of Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, to 2 pensionable service while computing the monthly members pension under Para 12 of Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 and sanctioning monthly members pension of Rs.6,133/- as against eligible monthly member's pension of Rs.7,384/-, is arbitrary, unjust, contrary to Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, discriminatory and in violation of Article 14 and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and set aside the same to that extent and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to add two years weightage to the pensionable service of the petitioner as per Para 10(2) read with Para 9(b) of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995 and sanction monthly member's pension as per Para 12 of the Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, by increasing the pensionable service by adding weightage of 2 years, draw pension accordingly to the petitioner from 01.06.2012, IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2281 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of the writ petition. IA NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP 27891 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A G SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY 2. MUJTAHID HUSSAIN The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 21.01.2026 PNS