Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23424 (KAR)

RAGHAVENDRA v. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PRIVATE LTD

WP/48376/2017 · 2026-06-24

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31313 WP No. 48376 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 48376 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. RAGHAVENDRA S/O MANJUNATHA, AGED 41 YEARS, FLAT NO.32, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIJAYASREE LAYOUT, BANNERGATTA, BANGALORE - 560 076. 2. ANASUYA R. W/O RAGHAVENDRA AGED 36 YEARS, FLAT NO.32, 2ND MAIN ROAD, VIJAYASREE LAYOUT, BANNERGATTA, BANGALORE - 560 076. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. C.V. SUDHINDRA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PRIVATE LTD HAVING R/AT NO.27, B.K.C. C-27, G BLOCK, BANDRA, KURLA COMPLEX, BANDRA EAST, MUMBAI - 400 051 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31313 WP No. 48376 of 2017 2. KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK PRIVATE LTD #59, SHREE COMPLEX, BHSC T BLOCK, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 085 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER SREENATH SURAMPUDI 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER HULIMAVU POLICE STATION, HULIMAVU BENGALURU - 560 076. 4. SRI G. SRINIVASALU NAIDU S/O G. GANGAIAH NAIDU, 5. SMT. JANAKAMMA.G W/O SRINIVASALU NAIDU, BOTH RESPONDENTS NO.4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT NO.380, DODDAMMA LAYOUT, HULIMAVU, BANNERGATTA ROAD, BENGALURU - 76 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SRINIVAS KUMAR, HCGP FOR R1 R2 SERVED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO.QUASH ALL NOTICES WHICH CONTAIN THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AS BELONG TO ITS ALLEGED CREDITORS (VIDE ANNEX-J) ISSUED ON 4.11.2016 AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:31313 WP No. 48376 of 2017 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 09.03.2018 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads as under: "The petitioner No 1 most respectfully submits that in view of compromise entered between the petitioner and the respondent Bank the petitioner crave the leave of this Hon'ble court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above petition. Hence the Memo seeking dismissal of the petition as withdrawn in the interest of justice." 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4