Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2342 (PAT)

Md. Yunus Khan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25503/2026 · 2026-04-22

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25503 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-596 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWAN BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== 1. Md. Yunus Khan S/o Hiran Khan Resident of Mohalla- Shiv Bazar, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra 2. Sarafraj Khan @ Moti S/o Hiran Khan Resident of Mohalla- Shiv Bazar, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Rajni Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2026 Heard Mrs. Rajni Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 596 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118, 109, 351(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S. lodged on 28.10.2025 by the informant, Shobha Kumari. 3. The short FIR alleges that these two petitioners beside Aman Shabaj assaulted by knifes on the head of the son of the informant aged 15 years. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that omnibus allegation of assault is on all the three persons and no repetition is there. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25503 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 5. Learned APP has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge order to show that allegation has been made against three persons, two of them before this Court, the bail of Aman Sahbaj stands rejected as per the observation of learned Sessions Judge. Further, it also shows that the injured suffered fracture on the first metacerpal bone. 6. Considering the submissions of the parties, as also the injury that has been sustained by the informant’s son, no relief can be extended. 7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T