Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 23412 (AP)

P.MOHAMMAD AZEEM v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/6114/2021 · 2026-02-08

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010416792021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6114/2021 Between: 1.P.MOHAMMAD AZEEM, S/O. P.MOHD. EDURS, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.87-1201-11-4, SOMISETTY NAGAR,' B' CAMP, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518002. 2.G.LAKSMI REDDY, S/O.G.SWAMY REDDY, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.9-283, GOWRI PETA, BETHAM CHERLA TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT-518599. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THROUGH SHO,P.S. III TOWN KURNOOL, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.G CHINNA VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O. LATE.G.NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, PRESENT R/O. RAMLINGESWARA NAGAR, KURNOOL CITY,KURNOOL DISTRICT. PERMANENT ADDRESS. C/O. H.NO.5-1-13, VALLABHA NAGAR, MAHABOOB NAGAR. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.CHALLA SIVASANKAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed. Considering that two years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026 VTS