Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:26017
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4715 of 2026 Naresh Maharolia S/o Hira Lal Maharolia Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No.23, Bohra Bagicha Gali, Khaparganj, Lajpat Rai, Nagar, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Raipur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 – Director, Directorate Of Urban Administration, And Development Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 – Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bilaspur District- Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, 4 – Collector, Bilaspur District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh,
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar Yadav, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Diksha Gouraha, Dy. Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.06.27 12:22:15 +0530
2 Hon'ble
Shri Bibhu Datta Guru
, Judge
Order
on Board
25.06.2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to provide him permanent status/ absorption in his respective post alongwith consequential benefits.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the issue involved in this writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court vide order dated 07.05.2026 passed in WPS No.3764 of 2026 (Rajni Sonwani & Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others), wherein this Court held as under:-
“5. The Claim of the petitioners are that, petitioners are continuously working in the department and are seeking relief of regularization. Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Narendra Kumar Tiwari & Others Versus State of Jharkhand & Others reported in SCC (L&S) 2018 (2) 472 for considering the temporary/daily wages employees, who had completed 10 years of service for regularization. Further, Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Jaggo Versus Union of India reported in (2024) SCC Online SC 3826 has further observed that the government departments to lead by example in providing fair and stable employment. Engaging workers on a temporary basis for extended periods, especially when their roles are integral to the organization's functioning, not only contravenes
3 international labour standards but also exposes the organization to legal challenges and undermines employee morale.
6. In above facts of the case and decisions of Hon'ble Supreme Court, this writ petition is disposed at this stage, permitting the petitioners to submit fresh comprehensive representation before the respondent No.3, and if, such a representation is submitted, the concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 months from the date of receipt of representation.
7. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction.”
3. In view of the above and having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and having gone through the materials available on record, it is evident that the facts and issue involved in this petition is identical to WPS No. 3764 of 2026, this Court deems it appropriate not to take a view other than what has been taken in the aforesaid writ petition.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the
order dated 07.05.2026 passed in WPS No. 3764 of 2026. Sd/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE $. Bhilwar