2026:JHHC:25324 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2282 of 2026 ------ Vikash Kumar Prasad, aged about 40 years, son of Akshay War Prasad, resident of 63A, DRV Colony, Bank Colony, Majhi Tola, P.O. and P.S. Adityapur, District Seraikella Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Nandini Saha, wife of Vikash Kumar Prasad, daughter of Sacheandra Sah, resident of Road No.1, Sankosai, near Durga Mandir, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... .... .... Opposite Parties CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Special P.P. ------ 02/21.08.2026 This petition is filed for modification of order dated 04.07.2017 passed in A.B.A. No.4969 of 2016. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner in A.B.A. No.4969 of 2016, the condition has been put to the petitioner to pay the current ad interim maintenance @ Rs.5000/- per month from the month August, 2017 latest to be deposited by 25th day of the English calendar in the Account of O.P. No.2 and it has been clarified in para 5 that the said order of ad interim maintenance granted to the O.P. No.2 is subject to the result of the order passed by competent jurisdiction. He submits that O.S. No.64 of 2020 which is a petition for divorce pending in the court of Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-I, Jamshedpur, by order dated 25.05.2026, ad interim maintenance has already been directed to be paid by the petitioner to the O.P. no.2 to the tune of Rs.5000/- and Rs.800/- as litigation expenses per appearance in the said case. He submits that in view of the subsequent order of the competent court, the order passed in A.B.A. may kindly be modified. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petition itself is misconceived one as the order passed by the co-ordinate Bench of 2026:JHHC:25324 this court in A.B.A. No.4969 of 2016 is clear. 4. In the said A.B.A., it has already been observed that the order of ad-interim maintenance granted to the O.P. No.2 is subject to the result of the order passed by the competent jurisdiction. Since the competent jurisdiction has passed the order later on 25.05.2026 in O.S. No.64 of 2020, there is no need of modification of the order of the co-ordinate Bench passed in the aforesaid A.B.A. which is very much clear. 5. With the above observation, this petition is dismissed. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 21.08.2026 Anit Uploaded 24.08.2026