APHC010418512021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6108/2021 Between: 1.DR B SRI HARSHA, S/O BVB MURALI KRISHNA AGED 33 YEARS OCCUPATION DOCTOR 2.INAVOLU PADMAVATHI, W/O BVB MURALI KRISHNA AGED 55 YEARS OCCUPATION HOUSE WIFE 3.B SARATHCHANDRA, S/O BVB MURALI KRISHNA AGED 27 YEARS OCCUPATION PRIVATE EMPLOYEE PETITIONERS 1 TO 3 ARE R/O H NO 44/45 AYODHYA NAGAR COLONY DR AS RAO NAGAR MEDCHAL-MALKAJGIRI TELANGANA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ANANTHAPURAMU III TOWN POLICE STATION REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 2.HOGIRALA SAI VANDANA, W/O DR B SRI HARSHA AGED 30 YEARS OCCUPATION GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE R/O PLOT NO 13-2-231 FLAT NO 303 4TH FLOOR SRINIVASA APARTMENTS NEAR SAI BABA TEMPLE RAMCHANDRA NAGAR, ANATHAPUR PIN CODE- 515001 ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.MANIKANTA THOTA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. In view of the continued absence of representation and the failure to advance arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 19.02.2026 VTS