M/s D G Enterprises and Anr v. The State of AP and 4 Ors
IA(C)/83/2026 · 2026-04-05
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 234 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 234 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040004862026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/83/2026 M/s D G Enterprises and Anr represented by its proprietor Shri Damli Niri, Son of Shri Tadam Niri, resident of Kamba Village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh. 791001 2: M/s Tali General Store Age: Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Bipu Tali Son of Shri Tobi Tali Gemo Tali Village PO and PS Kamba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 79100 VERSUS The State of AP and 4 Ors represented by the Secretary, Public Works Department, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar. 2:The Chief Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Department (CZ-B) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 3:The Superintending Engineer Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Circle Aalo Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 4:The Executive Engineer
Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Public Works Department Yomcha Division West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. 5:M/s Benji Loma Enterprises Age: 0 Occupation : represented by its proprietor Shri Gimit Kambu Rise Village PO and PS Liromoba West Siang District Arunachal Pradesh 79110 Advocate for the Petitioner : Duge Soki, Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP),
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER Date : 06-04-2026 Heard Shri D. Soki, learned counsel for the applicant, who has filed this interlocutory application praying for making a change in the description of respondents No.2 and 4. It is submitted that though the cause of action is against the Public Works Department by mistake, Rural Work Department was written against the respondent No.2. He also submits that there is some discrepancy in the description of respondent No.4, which has been sought to be corrected by means of this interlocutory application.
Also heard Ms P. Sangeeta, learned Government Advocate, who does
Page No.# 3/3 object to the same.
Considering the above and the nature of amendment prayed for, the instant interlocutory application is allowed. Petitioner is required to file amended cause title in the writ petition.
Interlocutory application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant