APHC010428332012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 30571/2012 Between: 1. V. RAVINDRANATH, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O V.S.N. MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 45-40-18/1, JAGGARAO COMPLEX, AKKAYYAPALEM, VISAKIAPATNAM ...PETITIONER AND 1. REGISTRAR ADMINISTRATION HIGH COURT OF AP HYD ANO, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR (ADMIAISTRATION) HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT JUDGE SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an appropriate Writ, order or directions mostly one which is in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant or equivalent post suitable to the qualifications and eligibility of the petitioner and appointing him to the post of attender as irregular, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjustified and unsustainable and direct the Respondents to appoint the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant or any other equivalent post and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 38984 OF 2012 2 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.30571 of 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondent to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for appointment to the post of Junior Assistant or any other equivalent posts suitable to his qualification and eligibility without insisting that he shall join the post of attender in pursuance of order P.R. No. 42, dated 17-7-2012 of the 2nd Respondent and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 43263 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the Writ Petition No. 30571/2012 by fixing an early date and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU POSANI 3 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.30571 of 2012 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present Writ Petition, on the basis of the written instructions given by the petitioner. 2. A copy of the said written instructions, dated 09.03.2026, have been placed before this Court and shall form part of the record. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 09.03.2026 KPV 4 RRR,J & TCDS,J W.P.No.30571 of 2012 203 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.30571 of 2012 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 09.03.2026 KPV