1 2026:CGHC:26041 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3105 of 2026 • Bakidan S/o Mohammad Aged About 55 Years R/o Ward No. -6 Sahaspur Tehsil Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur C.G. 3. The Divisional Commissioner Bilaspur Division Bilaspur Bistrict C.G. 4. The Collector Nazul Branch Sarangarh Disrict Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 5. Commissioner Municipal Corporation Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 6. The Sub Divisional Officer Revenue Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 7. The Tehsildar Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. 8. Chief Municipal Officer Nagar Palika Parishad Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Udho Ram Koshaley, Advocate. For State/Respondents No.1 to 7 : Mr. Sabysachi Choubey, Deputy G.A. For Respondent No.8 : Mr. R. S. Patel, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 25/06/2026 1. Heard. DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 06.12.2024 (Annexure-P/1) passed by the Tahsildar Sarangarh, District Sarangarh-Bilaigarh (C.G.) in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to allot the land of the petitioner for the purpose of residential house at the earliest, in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief, which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that notification dated 11.09.2019, 26.09.2019, 25.02.2020 and 24.02.2022 have already been withdrawn vide letter dated 23.07.2024, therefore, relief claimed by the petitioner cannot be granted. 4. In view of submission made by the counsel for the State, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before the appropriate authority/Court. 5. Considering the aforesaid aspect of the matter, petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file appropriate petition before the appropriate authority/Court. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty as prayed for. 7. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha