AFROOZA BEAGUM AND ANOTHER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS (SOCIAL WELFARE)
WP(C)/442/2026 · 2026-07-29
Shahzad Azeem
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2339 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2339 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 02 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 442/2026 CM No. 1182/2026
Afrooza Begum & Anr. … Petitioner(s)
Through: - Mr Wani Manzoor, Advocate.
V/s
Union Territory of J&K and Ors. … Respondent(s) Through: - Mr T. A. Lone, Dy. AG. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
(ORDER) 29.07.2026
01.
After arguing for some time, the learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners shall feel satisfied in case the present Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioners to move a detailed representation before the Respondents for seeking redressal of their grievance, with further direction to the Respondents to consider and decide the said representation within some reasonable timeframe.
02.
Mr T. A. Lone, the learned Deputy Advocate General, appearing on behalf of the Respondents, submits that he is not averse to the aforesaid proposition.
03.
Having regard to the nature of relief sought in the Petition and also with the consensus of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, this Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the Petitioners to file a detailed representation before the Respondents within a period of two weeks. Upon receipt of the said representation, the Respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon as per law/ rules governing the field expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months.
04.
Writ Petition is, thus, disposed of on the above terms, along with the connected CM.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE SRINAGAR July 29th, 2026
“TAHIR” Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document