Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2338 (JHR)

SHIVA SAMAD ALIAS FOTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10983/2025 · 2026-02-18

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:4883 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10983 of 2025 Shiva Samad @ Foto, Aged 21 Years, Son of Late Dipak Samad, Resident of Potka, P.O. & P.S. Chakardharpur, District, West Singhbhum, Jharkhand ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --- For the Petitioner : M/s. Vikas Pandey, Deepak Kr. Sinha, Advocates For the State : Mr. Subodh Kumar Dubey, APP --- 03/18.02.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The Petitioner has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 309(6) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 394 of I.P.C). 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is not named in the F.I.R and has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that other co- accused, namely, Ritik Munda against whom there was main allegation has been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 10835 of 2025 on 15.12.2025 and the case of the petitioner stands on similar footing to that of co-accused. He further submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 04.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this Court. 4. Learned A.P.P opposes the prayer for bail of the Petitioner. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner, 2026:JHHC:4883 2 coupled with the fact that other co-accused, namely, Ritik Munda has been granted bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 10835 of 2025 on 15.12.2025 and also the fact that he is in custody since 04.09.2025; hence, I am inclined to enlarge the Petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the above-named Petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Ld. C.J.M., Chaibasa in connection with Chaibasa Sadar P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the Petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this Petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this Petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 18th February, 2026 jk Uploaded on 21/02/2026